Skip to main content

Programmatic Law

Law is one of the most inefficient processes of modern society. Still it's effective, all things considered. The inefficiency lies in the fact that figuring out what is legal or not is a complicated process that involves lawyers. Originally law was supposed to be simple enough to be interpreted by jurors but now you almost have to be a jurist to understand the law. This inefficiency is even used as a bargaining chip in many cases with the threat of "tying this up in court for years."

How is that even possible? Law is not supposed to be obtuse, yet it gets that way.

The law's complexity has driven the need for a highly sub-specialized class of professionals, that rather than be advocates or expert advisors are more like translators to the arcane practices and language of law.

Have you ever read a contract and wondered what it meant? Then had it explained to you and you couldn't figure out why they didn't just said that, in plain language rather than the page of small print?

Most laws don't really require this level of obfuscation and in fact might work better if like a virtual game world they were coded in programmatic language rather than coded in lawyer-speak.

For example many laws have time deadlines for the filing of paperwork, and many times this deadlines are not only artificial, they are hard to find out with out some extensive knowledge of law. Local, State and Federal layers add to a complexity that only paid professional can dedicate the time to learn. I was watching a court-tv program and was blown away when a former tenant successfully sued her previous landlord because even though no one disputes that the tenant wrecked the apartment the landlord failed to give a written notice of the damages, so was ordered to return the deposit. I thought, how was he to know? There is no website you can go to and check the procedure and only a trained lawyer can read and understand law.

Interestingly, the parallels between law and programming are huge. But programming has a huge advantage: it's interactive. You can simulate circumstances and look at the results and learn from that.

However, the biggest advantage of doing law in programmatic way is that you can model it, experiment with it and do test cases in a far quicker way than you would otherwise. That way you could find out what law best achieves the intent of the law, rather than having to pass it to find out.

Seeing law this way requires a re-framing of what law is. Laws are the rules of a game, a game that society plays but not anything more than that. They are how things work only because we agree on them. Laws serve society or at least they are supposed to, society is not supposed to serve the law. By re-framing the law you can then tinker with it more effectively, in type of sand-box before having to pass it.

As people become more and more familiar with programing languages, many of the conditions and caveats of the law might be clearer when expresses in programming language.

Right now programs like Turbo Tax do that to an extent, but there is no reason why this language cant be added to the way laws are made.

Let's take the Estate Tax for example. In Japan Estate Taxes are really high, if you wanted to see how a high Estate Tax would affect people,  you could code it rather simply.

if your_assets > 1_000_000
 pay (your_assets - 1_000_000) / 2 

So here if your assets are over $1 million you pay %50 tax on the amount over it. Simple enough, the pseudo-code is actually cleaner, as it's clear the first $1 mil is tax excluded.


  1. eToro is the ultimate forex broker for beginning and pro traders.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to configure Ubuntu's keyboard to work like a Mac's

Typing accents on a PC is a complicated Alt + three numbered code affair. One feels like a sorcerer casting a spell. "I summon thee accented é! I press the weird magical key Alt, and with 0191 get the flipped question mark!" For a bilingual person this meant that writing on the computer was a start-and-stop process. With Mac's it a whole lot easier, just Alt + e and the letter you wanted for accents and alt + ? for the question mark. No need to leave the keyboard for the number pad and no need to remember arcane number combinations or have a paper cheat sheet next to the keyboard, as I've seen in virtually every secretaries computer in Puerto Rico.

Linux has a interesting approach to foreign language characters: using a compose key. You hit this key which I typically map to Caps Lock and ' and the letter you want and voilá you get the accent. Kinda makes sense: single quotation mark is an accent, double gets you the ümalaut, works pretty well. Except for the ñ, wh…

Contrasting Styles of Writing: English vs. Spanish

There is interestingly enough a big difference between what's considered good writing in Spanish and English. V.S. Naipul winner of the 2001 Nobel prize for literature publish an article on writing. In it he emphasizes the use of short clear sentences and encourages the lack of adjectives and adverbs. Essentially he pushes the writer to abandon florid language and master spartan communication. This is a desired feature of English prose, where short clipped sentences are the norm and seamlessly flow into a paragraph. In English prose the paragraph is the unit the writer cares about the most.

This is not the case in Spanish where whole short stories (I'm thinking this was Gabriel Garcia Marquez but maybe it was Cortázar) are written in one sentence. Something so difficult to do in English that the expert translator could best manage to encapsulate the tale in two sentences. The florid language is what is considered good writing in Spanish but unfortunately this has lead to what …

Fixing Autocomplete in Github's Atom Text Editor for Ruby

I really like Github's Atom Text Editor. I really like that it's multi-platform allowing me to master one set of skills that is transferable to all platforms and all machines. 

On thing that just burns me of the default set-up in Atom is the Autocomplete feature that seems to change my words as a type them. Because Ruby uses the end of line as a terminus for a statement you usually finish a word with pressing the return button and you get really annoying changes to your finished typed word a la MS Word. I find myself yelling "No that's not what I wrote!" at the screen in busy coffee shops.

I disabled autocomplete for a while but it is a very useful function. Then I found out they changed the package that gave the autocomplete to a new one called "Autocomplete Plus" that gives you more options. All that I needed to change to make autocomplete sane again:

1. Open Atom's Preferences
2. Search the bundled packages for "Autocomplete Plus"

3. Go to t…